Comparison of Kinematic Hardening vs Isotropic Hardening Plasticity Model for Low Cycle Fatigue Case
$ 180
The study aims to analyze the behavior of pipe bends under constant cyclic loading case. Two advanced plasticity model were adopted in the study based on von mises yield surface. The first model adopts Armstrong-Frederick (AF) non-linear kinematic hardening model based on center and size of the yield surface. The size of the yield surface is assumed to be constant. The Isotropic hardening plasticity law is implemented using UMAT based on power hardening rule based on yield condition and plastic flow rule. From the results it was concluded that the A-F kinematic hardening law can accurately predict the cyclic response for joints as compared to the isotropic hardening rule.
Access to Original Files
Our packages include comprehensive design documentation, detailed analysis reports, and essential files, all readily available for download. This collection ensures that you have everything needed to replicate the project or adapt it to fit your specific needs.
Project Customization
If you’d like to improve or modify our featured project to better suit your requirements, we offer customization services. This includes adjusting design parameters, adding extra analyses, or creating variations tailored to your industry or application.
Tutoring & Consultation
Receive expert guidance on complex engineering concepts through comprehensive tutorials and live sessions, designed to help you understand and apply these subjects effectively. Our expert-led tutorials provide a clear, step-by-step guide to complex engineering concepts.